Re: editors for sgml/xml
At 10:11 27/03/00 -0600, Steve Izma wrote:
>
> ....SNIP....SNIP....
>My opinion about sgml vs xml: sgml is more generic and
>thus covers more territory. I don't see why the current hype
>about xml should require us to name a package in order to attract
>people who don't understand the relationship between the two
>standards. And anything properly written in xml won't run into
>trouble with current sgml tools.
> ...snip....
Hi All
For what it's worth (NZ$0.02) i agree totally with Steve here.
Renaming or splitting the package is only going to create un-needed
work/complexity for the maintainer(s) and that just to cater to
ill-informed misconceptions.
Besides the description can include the magic three lettered word, no?
Enough noise from me
cheers
pre
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: