Re: ITP: transformiix
>> >> Looks like this is still sitting in Incoming. Obviously it's not
>> >> going into potato.
>> >
>> > It's not, but I can't find any reason for not including it. It's an
>> >isolated package, with just one binary, and considered stable by the
>> >upstream author.
>>
>> No new packages are going into frozen. That's part of what frozen
>> is. Probably the package would be in the archive by now if you had
>> just uploaded it to woody.
>
> Sit down and be quiet. I didn't upload it to potato.
Why be a jerk? You said you couldn't see why it shouldn't go into potato,
and I pointed out why it shan't be in potato.
>> >> Anyhow, when it gets into woody, let me know, and
>> >> I'll add it to task-sgml ... or would it be task-sgml-dev ?
>> >
>> > task-sgml? wouldn't that be task-xml?
>> I don't have a separate task-xml, since task-sgml actually is for
>> both. Remember XML is a subset of SGML, so it's SGML by definition.
> The technologies involved hardly are a subset, there are lots of things in
>XML that SGML users doesn't care about, and the opposite too. XML might have
>started as an SGML subset, bu that's not where it is heading to.
Well, if you really think we should split the metapackages I maintain
into XML and SGML versions, you should probably file a bug to that effect
against task-sgml. Probalby it would help me if it included a list of
pkgs which should be in it.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: