Re: ITP: transformiix
> >> Looks like this is still sitting in Incoming. Obviously it's not
> >> going into potato.
> >
> > It's not, but I can't find any reason for not including it. It's an
> >isolated package, with just one binary, and considered stable by the
> >upstream author.
>
> No new packages are going into frozen. That's part of what frozen
> is. Probably the package would be in the archive by now if you had
> just uploaded it to woody.
Sit down and be quiet. I didn't upload it to potato.
> >> Anyhow, when it gets into woody, let me know, and
> >> I'll add it to task-sgml ... or would it be task-sgml-dev ?
> >
> > task-sgml? wouldn't that be task-xml?
> I don't have a separate task-xml, since task-sgml actually is for
> both. Remember XML is a subset of SGML, so it's SGML by definition.
The technologies involved hardly are a subset, there are lots of things in
XML that SGML users doesn't care about, and the opposite too. XML might have
started as an SGML subset, bu that's not where it is heading to.
Reply to: