Re: ITP: transformiix
> > > Looks like this is still sitting in Incoming. Obviously it's not
> > > going into potato.
> > It's not, but I can't find any reason for not including it. It's an
> > isolated package, with just one binary, and considered stable by the
> > upstream author.
> That may be, but it's already outdated (it implements an older version
> of the spec), so it will only confuse people when they can finally buy
> potato CDs in a couple of months.
Nah..
> > > Anyhow, when it gets into woody, let me know, and
> > > I'll add it to task-sgml ... or would it be task-sgml-dev ?
> > task-sgml? wouldn't that be task-xml?
> I hope you're joking. If we create more task-* packages that depend on
> let's say 10 packages each, we could still wind up with 400 task-*
> packages.
>
> The "sgml" in task-sgml should be read the same way as in debian-sgml.
> I'd like to hear from the sgml people who are sure they'll never touch
> xml, and the xml people who won't touch useful stuff like jade, sp,
> psgml, etc because they're really sgml tools.
Hum.. no.. but if there will be just one, it should be XML, that is the mor
important and visible now.
Reply to: