Re: Jade vs OpenJade: should fork or no?
eichin@thok.org (Mark W. Eichin) writes:
> I don't think "experimental" is necessary, the package system isn't at
> risk. From a user perspective, I guess I'd like to be able to have
> both installed so that if one doesn't work for something I could try
> the other; likewise for hacking on dsssl-style sheets, it would be
> nice to test them against both before release... so that's an argument
> for having them both installable together, if it isn't too complex...
Oh, not complex at all. Pretty much already done.
I could go further even and provide alternatives for nsgmls, jade, etc
also.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: