[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sven Rudolph: Re: still looking for someone to adopt sgml-tools?



> I see The original & upstream author of sgml-tools say that sgml-tools (v1)
> has no support now, and transition to DocBook and sgmltools-2 (v2) is
> recommended. But right now the development of v2 may be suspended because
> the author wrote it on http://www.sgmltools.org/suspended.html, so I don't
> know what should I recommend to use for JF people. JF people have the will
> to upgrade to v2 tools, but development of JP patch for 2.0 series does
> not progress for several months and now the combination of sgml-tools 1.0.9 
> and JF patch for it is only usable solution for them.

First, I want to make sure you are clear on the difference between
SGMLtools v1 and v2.  v1 is a local, non-std DTD (LinuxDoc), which
uses custom SGMLasp to provide rendering; therefore, it is
non-standard and custom thru-and-thru.

v2 of SGMLtools is completely different.  It is based on the DocBook
DTD, which is maintained by OASIS, and has been around for a while,
and is very popular for technical documentation.  Moreover, it uses
DSSSL, which is an ISO standard for doing rendering.  In the future
this might move to and XML DTD and using XSL instead of DSSSL, but
that doesn't matter to the author.  See the URLs in
/usr/doc/docbook-stylesheets/README.Debian for more info.

Therefore, with or without SGMLtools, adopting DocBook is a good idea,
even in SGMLtools went away tomorrow.

Moreover, Norm Walsh's DSSSL stylesheets DocBook are i18n and l10n'd.
They already include japaense support.  As the Jade maintainer, and
the sgml-data and docbook-stylesheets maintain, I'd love to work with
you and the upstream maintainers to make sure that any issues are
solved.  It's also important that we have a convenience SGML framework
for translators to use.

> Now I am happy to know that Stephane will be the new maintainer of 
> sgml-tools and I hope that he can merge that JF patch into his coming 
> new package.

Yes that would be nice.  Despite what I said above, I think we ought
to provide *some* level of support to SGMLtools v1.

--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


Reply to: