Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG

To: fosres@posteo.de, debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 16:43:40 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 5016ece7e6027bd5479a334c6c4f791d0ea8e092.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] d3aba6cdf64e395e7a1238783f6282e8@posteo.de>
References: <[🔎] d3aba6cdf64e395e7a1238783f6282e8@posteo.de>

On Sun, 2025-08-10 at 14:35 +0000, fosres@posteo.de wrote:
> Hello Debian Security Team,

For the record, you sent this mail to a public discusson list, not to
the Security Team.

Regards,

Adam

Reply to:

References:
- Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG
  - From: fosres@posteo.de

Prev by Date: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG
Next by Date: Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG
Previous by thread: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG
Next by thread: Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread