Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 06:43:37PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 03:20:36PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> >
> > Would you be OK if we track the above proposal on a salsa issue in,
> > https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/issues?
> > If you are OK, I could volunteer to file the issue. But I'd be happy if
> > Samuel files it too.
> >
> > As you are aware, the Debian LTS team is planning to hold a sprint
> > during DebCamp 25. And if the above proposal is beneficial for you too
> > (I think this would help us in the context of LTS and ELTS), it would be
> > great to include it in the "target issues" to be addressed in the
> > context of the sprint.
>
> Given during development there will be needed review, maybe subtask
> etc ... yes I agree that we can start tracking the tasks around the
> nonissue state as issue in the tracker.
>
> So to move it outside of a mail thread directly to the salsa.
>
For the sake of completeness, here is the issue that Samuel has written:
https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/issues/32
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Reply to: