Re: debcheckroot v2.0 released
- To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: debcheckroot v2.0 released
- From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 23:57:08 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAKTje6GB+i5GNqhVq3+xzx17e5Dpp=RcwwSuMeY9o954XG+ioA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] b74b1527-d500-6939-2a36-5361deeb5973@vheuser.com>
- References: <b2489138-53ee-e747-31cc-cdce48339dbe@zoho.com> <86cdcb82-770e-c1a2-71e4-12347193b66a@gmail.com> <ebe26c79-2d4d-0df0-ff19-05f46f3cca58@riseup.net> <b96c241b-3023-54c9-4703-1ca59a8ad8a9@gmail.com> <CAO1P-kBxPFX_s7VVH=K6fO=oh6H2FLiMdv_txdwkXCf-8ydPcg@mail.gmail.com> <e0b57757-da9a-1824-149f-9f49c9312515@gmail.com> <46c05a86-1c2d-436a-a37d-5cca18a68bcf@gmail.com> <39e4e14a-26e1-be1c-7108-3824d32e28a1@gmail.com> <e0b4b492-afa2-7ee1-cb0f-12f887f1a9e2@gmail.com> <2e13d71d-f29b-3cb2-4147-5fcf9c8c6a3e@gmail.com> <2a3b7e9a-d483-e4c8-8761-6803b6faf011@gmail.com> <CAKTje6ExBrtZoW+J-pdDW2+r3EJV0dVjVyakTSNfz2WUs+EOVw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKTje6HY-+tAeDkcSZyHdBKKWk1AiSaVr2jQuFhobuiTgtuCxA@mail.gmail.com> <4d768eaf-4b60-c060-3e68-7bfcbaa334aa@elstel.org> <a96c3b9cbc6df435b6a1c6bc1e20eb2c21f8f524.camel@debian.org> <1f279581-fd7b-b054-013c-d0a527db59e0@elstel.org> <c0c4f2eb10e435f81f3ba8f1cd5e7c1fe9391500.camel@debian.org> <e5906e91-201e-6b91-5fad-b60b4ce33180@elstel.org> <[🔎] b74b1527-d500-6939-2a36-5361deeb5973@vheuser.com>
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 6:01 PM vince@vheuser.com wrote:
> Did the discussion of continuing support for DANE end??
In case I mislead anyone, a clarification:
Debian itself isn't going to actively work on removing support for
DANE from anything nor removing our DANE/DNSSEC records.
Support for DANE is never going to happen for the web (given the
opinions of the major browser makers) and it could disappear in other
upstream projects as the popularity of DoH/DoT and other things in the
DNS space eclipse DANE/DNSSEC. Should that happen to the software
Debian uses for DNS/DANE, we may be forced to drop our DANE/DNSSEC
records.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: