RE: [SECURITY] [DSA 3386-2] unzip regression update
Hi Salvatore,
Your e-mail below states:
"For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in version 6.0-16+deb8u2" (Note bene the last digit)
However, https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3386 states:
"For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in version 6.0-16+deb8u1"
Regards,
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso [mailto:carnil@debian.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 November 2015 9:01 AM
To: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
Subject: [SECURITY] [DSA 3386-2] unzip regression update
Importance: High
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3386-2 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso
November 09, 2015 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : unzip
Debian Bug : 804595
The update for unzip issued as DSA-3386-1 introduced a regression when extracting 0-byte files. Updated packages are now available to address this regression.
For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in version 6.0-8+deb7u5.
For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in version 6.0-16+deb8u2.
For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in version 6.0-20.
We recommend that you upgrade your unzip packages.
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=h0yH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: