Re: [PATCH] Re: Logjam mitigation for Wheezy?
micah dixit:
>> (as I have been doing for a while) that even the DH part of the handshake be
>> protected by the server (and, optionally, client) certificate.
>
>This doesn't mean anything, as far as I can tell. Unless you mean "by
Encrypted, actually, is what I mean.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
> Wish I had pine to hand :-( I'll give lynx a try, thanks.
Michael Schmitz on nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k
a.k.a. {news.gmane.org/nntp}#news.gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k in pine
Reply to: