Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 2911-1] icedove security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 04/22/2014 11:25 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2911-1 security@debian.org
> http://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz
> Muehlenhoff April 22, 2014
> http://www.debian.org/security/faq
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
<snippage>
>
> For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed
> in version 24.4.0esr-1.
I've been checking ever since I saw this announcement and I still
don't see a sign of this version in the sid repos yet (I'm not pasting
in my apt-get update, but I obviously did that immediately prior):
root@yap:~# apt-get install icedove
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
icedove is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1459 not upgraded.
root@yap:~# dpkg -l icedove
ii icedove 24.4.0-1
Does anyone have any more information about the delay? Or possibly
I'm wrong about my own assumption(s)/understanding here.
thanks so much in advance for any clues,
~c
>
> We recommend that you upgrade your icedove packages.
>
> Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
> these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
> found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
>
> Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/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=4vIn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: