On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:03 PM, adrelanos <adrelanos@riseup.net> wrote:I'm not a lawyer but even I know a vendor like Intel or AMD cannot
> Microcode. (I guess if the vulnerability can not be fixed with some kind
> of firmware upgrade and is used in the wild, that would be a reason to
> get it replaced for free or being required to buy a new one.)
"require" you to buy a new processor as long as it's under warranty,
and security/performance issues do count as a warranty issue... they
do microcode updates now to avoid having to recall because of that
type of situation not to mention the numerous other benefits such as
fast shipping and other stuff.
Archive: [🔎] CAM5XQnzeQg4-8qcYXryBWjaNqrUmPEVSXtLgES3mrHXJwT54Jg@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] CAM5XQnzeQg4-8qcYXryBWjaNqrUmPEVSXtLgES3mrHXJwT54Jg@mail.gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org