Logs errors on Debian Squeeze with Bind 9.7.3
Good morning people
Since I upgraded to BIND 9.7.3 Debian 6, I'm having a lot of logs as I've
outlined.
error (network unreachable) resolving
'98.31.207.117.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN': 2001:500:13::73#53: 1 Time(s)
error (network unreachable) resolving
'ABTS-mp-Dynamic-075.161.168.122.airtelbroadband.in/A/IN':
2001:500:45::1#53: 1 Time(s)
error (network unreachable) resolving 'NSS2.CODETEL.NET.DO/AAAA/IN':
2001:468:d01:20::80df:2023#53: 1 Time(s)
error (network unreachable) resolving 'SEC3.APNIC.NET/A/IN':
2001:500:13::c7d4:35#53: 1 Time(s)
error (unexpected RCODE REFUSED) resolving
'222.187.173.122.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN': 202.56.230.5#53: 1 Time(s)
error (unexpected RCODE REFUSED) resolving
'244.76.168.122.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN': 202.56.230.6#53: 1 Time(s)
error (unexpected RCODE REFUSED) resolving 'ns01.wl-infra.net/A/IN':
62.75.191.6#53: 2 Time(s)
error (unexpected RCODE SERVFAIL) resolving 'ns6.kvack.org/A/IN':
199.249.120.1#53: 1 Time(s)
error (unexpected RCODE SERVFAIL) resolving 'utn.edu.ar/NS/IN':
200.16.98.2#53: 1 Time(s)
error (unexpected RCODE SERVFAIL) resolving 'zone-ns6.dnswl.org/A/IN':
199.249.120.1#53: 1 Time(s)
success resolving 'ABTS-MP-Dynamic-073.132.175.122.airtelbroadband.in/A'
(in 'airtelbroadband.in'?) after disabling EDNS: 1 Time(s)
success resolving
'ABTS-North-Dynamic-222.187.173.122.airtelbroadband.in/A' (in
'airtelbroadband.in'?) after reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to
512 octets: 1 Time(s)
success resolving
'ABTS-North-Static-039.25.160.122.airtelbroadband.in/A' (in
'airtelbroadband.in'?) after disabling EDNS: 1 Time(s)
success resolving 'dnsbom.mantraonline.com/AAAA' (in
'mantraonline.com'?) after disabling EDNS: 1 Time(s)
success resolving 'dnsdel.mantraonline.com/A' (in 'mantraonline.com'?)
after disabling EDNS: 1 Time(s)
I already made several changes including:
/etc/default/bind9
Resolvconf = yes
OPTIONS = "-4-u bind-S 1024"
and named.conf:
logging {
category lame-servers {null;}
category edns-disabled {null;}
};
Any ideas?
Regards,
Marcelo O.
Reply to: