Re: what security lists would you consider "a must" to be on?

To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: what security lists would you consider "a must" to be on?
From: Thibault VINCENT <tibal@reloaded.fr>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:29:19 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200912112129.19866.tibal@reloaded.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 2be970b50912101337h6fb668a0j57cf4840aac4548e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 2be970b50912101337h6fb668a0j57cf4840aac4548e@mail.gmail.com>

Hello

> I see that full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk and
> bugtraq@securityfocus.com are cc'd on the Ubuntu Security
> Announcements list.
> What lists do you swear by?

If you're interested in 0day threats, you might want to subscribe to full-
disclosure because some vulnerabilities get released earlier there -- it's not  
moderated. But as a result, the noise ratio is much higher than on Bugtrack :)
That's why I prefer the later as well as Secunia. Also, you can watch rss 
feeds of sites like milw0rm.com. 

I'm interested in security ML too, if there are more to know of.

Thanks

-- 
Thibault VINCENT <tibal@reloaded.fr>
Jabber : tibal@jabber.fr
KeyID : 0x4BA8A39B

Reply to:

References:
- what security lists would you consider "a must" to be on?
  - From: john <lists.john@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: what security lists would you consider "a must" to be on?
Next by Date: gmonstart / jvregisterclasses in tons of binaries with commands,malware?
Previous by thread: what security lists would you consider "a must" to be on?
Next by thread: gmonstart / jvregisterclasses in tons of binaries with commands,malware?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread