Re: Misunderstanding about normal (stable) and security channels

To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Misunderstanding about normal (stable) and security channels
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:21:15 +0200
Message-id: <slrng8s71b.3o0.jmm@inutil.org>
References: <d0e937440807280515r7f6f9120x3f12bdedce7e1a71@mail.gmail.com> <200807282324.56689.steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de> <d0e937440807280654t39b1b4d0m7ee2355e55d3b868@mail.gmail.com> <200807290007.09572.steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de> <d0e937440807280727s5e14102fm9e2aadc3af905715@mail.gmail.com> <488DF178.9040305@vallit.fi> <7ff145960807280954w3ef275bdk63b79f587dfb77d0@mail.gmail.com>

Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Riku Valli <riku.valli@vallit.fi> wrote:
>> May be debsecan is suitable for you?
>
> Hold crap Batman!  That's a lot of "low urgency" issues open in Etch.

That's due to debsecan bugs #473083 and #478175

Cheers,
        Moritz

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Re: Misunderstanding about normal (stable) and security channels
  - From: "Frédéric PICA" <frederic.pica@gmail.com>
- Re: Misunderstanding about normal (stable) and security channels
  - From: Steffen Joeris <steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de>
- Re: Misunderstanding about normal (stable) and security channels
  - From: "Frédéric PICA" <frederic.pica@gmail.com>
- Re: Misunderstanding about normal (stable) and security channels
  - From: Riku Valli <riku.valli@vallit.fi>
- Re: Misunderstanding about normal (stable) and security channels
  - From: "Jim Popovitch" <yahoo@jimpop.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Misunderstanding about normal (stable) and security channels
Next by Date: Re: Misunderstanding about normal (stable) and security channels
Previous by thread: Re: Misunderstanding about normal (stable) and security channels
Next by thread: Re: Misunderstanding about normal (stable) and security channels
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread