Hi, [removed some of the cc:s] On Sunday 13 April 2008 02:23, Andrea Barisani wrote: > We already agreed that CC-BY-NC is not open enough, that's why we will > consider CC-BY. > > I believe that license address your concerns, right? If its CC-BY 3.0, yes. 2.5 is not good enough, afaik ;) regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgp9qa__V867B.pgp
Description: PGP signature