[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Is oldstable security support duration something to be proud of?




On 2008-03-10, Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com> wrote:
> I already compared the duration of oldstable support in the bug report, but > let's look at the total security support duration of each release of other > free distros if you want. Let's take these 3 which are not too far from > Debian's quality:
> RHEL and derivatives: 7 years
> openSUSE: 2 years
> Ubuntu: a bit more complex.
> 	1.5 in general
> 	LTS releases: 3 on desktop, 5 on server
>
> Debian is somewhat better than openSUSE, equal or slightly worst than Ubuntu > and definitely worst than RHEL and derivatives. So on average, Debian is > somewhat worst than its main alternatives in this aspect. IMO one shouldn't > show off unless being at least a bit above average.

you are doing your math wrong.

Debian sarge is 33 months with around 9000 source packages. Let us count
that as 33*9000 = 297000 security points
Thanks, I didn't know that duration was measured in security points nowadays.


Reply to: