Re: Is oldstable security support duration something to be proud of?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Mon Mar 10, 2008 at 17:57:04 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>
>> It should be supported as long as RHEL.
>
> Give me piles of cash and I'll support it for as long as you want.
>
> But this discussion is pointless. The statement is true *we* are
> proud; regardless of whether you or anybody else agrees or not.
>
> As has already been hashed out on the debian-www list.
>
> Steve
For what it's worth, I'm proud of you guys.
I do volunteer work for a much smaller project, and it's hard but
satisfying.
The fact is, doing *anything* out of the goodness of your heart is
admirable. Doing the amount of work that it takes to keep such a massive
package base secure is legendary.
If i gave you a Toyota would you really complain that it wasn't a Porsche?
Regards
Rich Healey
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFH1dhILeTfO4yBSAcRAi0jAJ4jhk/Hb3LGrOQUhQpMKEMjLMdhmQCfQ/Yw
0YekXS3dYAFWHsKFqrdlTxk=
=wl4Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: