This one time, at band camp, Filipus Klutiero said: > RHEL and derivatives: 7 years This is longer than Debian. > openSUSE: 2 years > Ubuntu: a bit more complex. > 1.5 in general > LTS releases: 3 on desktop, 5 on server These are all shorter, except for Ubuntu server LTS. So your complaint is that, even though Debian's security team does actually rank in the top half of the examples you put forward (and I'm not even going to discuss the fact that the 2 that do longer security support have paid people doing it, not volunteers), they have nothing to be proud of? And denigrating the work they do and telling them they have nothing to be proud of is good why? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature