Re: Is oldstable security support duration something to be proud of?
Le March 10, 2008 04:24:22 pm Jim Popovitch, vous avez écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Debian is somewhat better than openSUSE, equal or slightly worst than
> > Ubuntu and definitely worst than RHEL and derivatives. So on average,
> > Debian is somewhat worst than its main alternatives in this aspect.
>
> On what data do you base the above claims?
On the text above the paragraph you quoted:
> Let's take these 3 which are not too far from
> Debian's quality:
> RHEL and derivatives: 7 years
> openSUSE: 2 years
> Ubuntu: a bit more complex.
> 1.5 in general
> LTS releases: 3 on desktop, 5 on server
...and on the security support duration of Debian releases, approximately 2.5
to 3 years.
Reply to: