Re: Is oldstable security support duration something to be proud of?
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le March 10, 2008 03:15:04 pm Jim Popovitch, vous avez écrit :
>
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Le March 10, 2008 02:57:56 pm Jim Popovitch, vous avez écrit :
> > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > This statement is in a security announcement. Martin Schulze
> > > > > confirmed that he wrote the statement. Does the security team think
> > > > > that oldstable security support duration is something to be proud
> > > > > of?
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > >
> > > If you don't mind, how did you get the opinion of the security team on
> > > this?
> >
> > I read their text.
> Which one?
Their public one, the one you referenced. Why do you perceive that
they shouldn't be proud? Where is your basis that they don't deserve
to be proud?
-Jim P.
Reply to: