Re: secure installation

To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: secure installation
From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:13:49 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070816151349.d5058744.celejar@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 2e4e9dbd0708151223q2f88f8e1m7689fb2912ca16fd@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 2e4e9dbd0708151223q2f88f8e1m7689fb2912ca16fd@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:23:06 -0500
Pat <paparsoss@gmail.com> wrote:

[snip]

>  3) Do we really need portmap, inetd, or nfs running by default on our
>  workstations?

http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2006/01/default-services-in-debian-this.html

See section 12.1.14.1 - 3 here:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch12.en.html


Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- On Distro to rule them all (was: secure installation)
  - From: Jim Popovitch <yahoo@jimpop.com>

References:
- secure installation
  - From: Pat <paparsoss@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: secure installation
Next by Date: On Distro to rule them all (was: secure installation)
Previous by thread: Re: secure installation
Next by thread: On Distro to rule them all (was: secure installation)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread