RE: apt-check-sigs and apt-get sig errors
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Reising [mailto:mreising@nixda.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 11:18 AM
> To: Hedges, Mark
> Subject: Re: apt-check-sigs and apt-get sig errors
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:13:40AM -0700, Hedges, Mark wrote:
> > --------------------
> >
> > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
> > and may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized
> review, use,
> > disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not
> the intended
> > recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
> > copies of the original message.
>
> What is the idea behind using that nonsens in an email body,
> especially in mailinglist like this, where every email will
> be found by google?
>
> --
> Nicht Absicht unterstellen, wenn auch Dummheit ausreicht!
>
That's a good question. It's tagged on by our outbound mail server. I
can't do anything about it. But I have no choice, I can only use this
mail from here.
What is the idea behind flaming me for something I have no control over?
A cover for having no intelligent response? I suppose for you,
"stupidity is sufficient," as your sig says.
If someone happens to know anything about my question, I would really
appreciate the advice. I always wait until later to do apt-get update
again, when I no longer get signature errors. It is just confusing.
Mark
--------------------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message.
Reply to: