Re: first A record of security.debian.org extremely slow

To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: first A record of security.debian.org extremely slow
From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:32:25 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060302193224.GD9733@mathom.us>
Mail-followup-to: debian-security@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87psl4k6ow.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <20060220222813.63787.qmail@web81702.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <UJYs4B.A.z6.muvAEB@mobilix.private> <20060227143120.GA30533@lapse.madduck.net> <[🔎] 87acc9j0dq.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] 20060301222021.GA11096@lapse.madduck.net> <[🔎] 87psl4k6ow.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:06:07PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:

* martin f. krafft:

Why then do you think security.d.o is not mirrored by Debian?


Our mirror network is not actually well-known for its integrity (think

The explanation is far simpler--debian *does* have mirrors ofsecurity.debian.org. At the moment I see three hosts in the rotation.Why not add more? Well, what problem does that solve?

--
Michael Stone

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: first A record of security.debian.org extremely slow
  - From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>

References:
- Re: first A record of security.debian.org extremely slow
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: first A record of security.debian.org extremely slow
  - From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: first A record of security.debian.org extremely slow
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>

Prev by Date: Re: first A record of security.debian.org extremely slow
Next by Date: Re: first A record of security.debian.org extremely slow
Previous by thread: Re: first A record of security.debian.org extremely slow
Next by thread: Re: first A record of security.debian.org extremely slow
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread