Re: Bad press again...
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * martin f. krafft:
>> > I think Alvin was alluding to how it *should* be solved. As in: we
>> > should have more than one security server, globally spaced.
>>
>> security.debian.org already is a Single Point of Ownership. I don't
>> think we need multiple ones, so this is definitely a post-etch thing.
>
> Irrelevant if secure apt is deployed correctly.
Yes, that's why it is a post-etch thing, realistically speaking.
Reply to: