Re: Bad press again...

[tomasz abramowicz <tomasz@spin.it>]

martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Timo Veith <tv@rz-zw.fh-kl.de> [2005.08.26.1726 +0200]:
>
> > > either case can be solved by:  security1.debian.org in LA
> > > and security2.debian.org in NYC and security3.debian.org in berlin :-)
> >
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree
> > Reading extended state information
> > Initializing package states... Done
> > Err http://security3.debian.org sarge/updates/main Packages
> >  Could not resolve 'security3.debian.org'
>
>
> I think Alvin was alluding to how it *should* be solved. As in: we
> should have more than one security server, globally spaced.
>
> Heck, we *should* have a responsive and communicative security team.

why arent all redundant security servers included in the sources.list,
or why doesnt it ask at install time to include all backup security servers?
as well as security.debian.org?

t.