Re: On Mozilla-* updates

To: David Ehle <ehle@agni.phys.iit.edu>
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 21:16:32 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050803011632.GQ19080@mathom.us>
Mail-followup-to: David Ehle <ehle@agni.phys.iit.edu>, debian-security@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0508021916030.27146-100000@agni.phys.iit.edu>
References: <[🔎] 20050802222057.GB19967@alcor.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0508021916030.27146-100000@agni.phys.iit.edu>

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:28:00PM -0500, David Ehle wrote:

This is not a rant, its cutting through the horse crap.  If what I am
suggesting is already policy then why are we having this discussion?  Why
was there ever an unsecure version of Mozilla in Woody?


Nobody took the initiative to create an updated mozilla package for

woody, including fixing any dependency issues.

Mike Stone

Reply to:

References:
- Re: On Mozilla-* updates
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
- Re: On Mozilla-* updates
  - From: David Ehle <ehle@agni.phys.iit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Next by Date: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Previous by thread: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Next by thread: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread