Re: On Mozilla-* updates

To: Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx>
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@cs.msu.su>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:59:30 +0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 200508011059.31209@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] m3zms2jgd1.fsf@neo.luffy.cx>
References: <20050729164338.GB1029@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> <1317841.s6JTOREOx2@sercond.dubki.ru> <[🔎] m3zms2jgd1.fsf@neo.luffy.cx>

> > Requiring users to install an important component (which Mozilla is)
> > from other sources is a bad idea in this context. I think it should
> > not be the way how Debian solves it's problems.
>
> For supporting this point, Firefox  is ranked 244 on popcon. Konqueror
> is 545.

I'm afraid popcon is not authorative in this issue. Browser is primamry for 
desktops, and desktop users probably don't widely participate in popcon.

Konqueror is installed together with the rest of KDE - actually as a 
dependency - and that's why it is rated high.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: On Mozilla-* updates
  - From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx>

Prev by Date: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Next by Date: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Previous by thread: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Next by thread: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread