Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 644-1] New chbg packages fix arbitrary code execution
Quoting s. keeling (keeling@spots.ab.ca):
> The problem here is the nitwit factor.
Yes, well, a bunch of us have been keeping an eye on Linux MUAs and
default mailcap behaviour for 10+ years, to make sure zeal for
simplicity doesn't lead coders or distro assemblers to do something
dumb. Thus my question of the other poster.
I wasn't going to hold my breath waiting for a qualifying, valid
response of the "Why certainly; please have a look at this" variety,
but much can happen in a wide universe. At that point, appropriate
cluebats get deployed, etc.
> I say again to the original poster, get a better MUA, running on a
> better OS.
Quite.
--
Cheers, Hardware: The part you kick.
Rick Moen Software: The part you boot.
rick@linuxmafia.com
Reply to: