[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: murphy in sbl.spamhaus.org



George Georgalis schrieb/wrote/a écrit/escribió:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:57:31AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >* Christian Storch:
> >> What about greylisting depending on results of e.g. SA?
> >> Only above a limit of scores from SA greylisting would be become active.
> >This is very impolite because it requires that the entire message is
> >transferred at least twice.
> I thought greylisting closes the smtp connection with a temporary
> failure immediately to unfamiliar routers. Then they can transmit the
> message on a second attempt, but since spam relays don't queue, they
> won't try again.

Chrisitan proposed greylisting based on SA scores - that requires the
messages to be transmitted before rejecting them the first time (with
an temporary error), and then to be transmitted again.

It's a matter of time til the spammers begin to implement queues in
their spamware (on some infected Windows zombies). Greylisting is
obsolete then.

Attachment: pgpSzRW6KeDKs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: