Re: Rebuilding packages on *all* architectures
Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
> The binary is needed because otherwise the -all packages would be
> missing and there would be no deb package in the archive holding the
> source in.
The first problem is solved by having one of the arch's autobuilders
also be responsible for the Arch: all packages--presumably which ever
keeps up the most with its queue would be the best choice.
The second problem is solved by changing the way the archive
management works.
Thomas
Reply to: