Re: rbl's status?

[Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-news2004-05@lina.inka.de>]

In article <[🔎] 871xki7ttk.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> you wrote:
> This sort of thing is why I would rather use any RBL within
> SpamAssassin, rather than at SMTP delivery time. Even if one of these
> services goes completely belly up and blacklists the world, I don't
> automatically lose mail from it.

Please  dont do this. You MUST reject mails (by spam scanners, malware
scanners or blacklists) on the SMTP level, otherwise you become a pretty big
annoyance to the internet (if you bounce) or will siletnly lose mails (if
you drop them).


Greetings
Bernd
-- 
eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/
Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/