Re: rbl's status?
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:48, Dale Amon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
> > RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
>
> Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
> re-reads the whole doc a second time, rather than
> just a search for a specific keyword?
I didn't. I did `zless /usr/share/doc/exim4/spec.txt.gz' and searched
for RBL. That's the first hit. ;-)
> I've tried a couple times. Puts me right to sleep :-)
No comment. :) The index is very useful...
Adam
Reply to: