Re: rbl's status?
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
> RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
re-reads the whole doc a second time, rather than
just a search for a specific keyword?
I've tried a couple times. Puts me right to sleep :-)
--
------------------------------------------------------
Dale Amon amon@islandone.org +44-7802-188325
International linux systems consultancy
Hardware & software system design, security
and networking, systems programming and Admin
"Have Laptop, Will Travel"
------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: