Re: Unusual spam recently - hummm - postprocess
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 04:34:44PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
Gee, I guess that relay should have rejected the spam instead of relaying
it, right? Then, it wouldn't feel a compulsion to issue a completely
inappropriate "bounce" [sic] message to a forged sender.
I'm sure the guy who got joe jobbed is happy that you can point out the
source of his misforture. Must be real comforting and all.
Do I win a prize, or was that just a qualifying round, and the real
questions, that actually require thinking, will come later?
I'm not sure you'd qualify for the thinking round. Seems like you're
just a big ball of spam hating fury, no?
Mike Stone
Reply to: