Re: mozilla - the forgotten package?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
Am Mittwoch, 10. März 2004 22:39 schrieb Florian Weimer:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > > Okay, if that's the case, I'm going to start a campaign for including
> > > Mozilla 1.4 (plus fixes) in stable.
> >
> > Well why just include 1.4 and not 1.6?
>
> AFAIK, 1.4 is the more stable branch, and fixes are still backported to
> it (at least by MandrakeSoft 8-).
Is that your campaign?
http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/ticker/article.php?mid=1183
Imho security fixes for mozilla are very important. Some exploits currently
existing in mozilla justifies some rc bugs for mozilla.
Imho the consequences of being unable to provide sec. updates for a popular
end-user client software is obvious: Kick the package out of stable, testing
and unstable!
Being in stable implicies security, which is NOT provided.
Just me 2cents.
Keep smiling
yanosz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)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=XlV6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: