[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GnuPG & mutt on Woody 3.0r2.



Incoming from Adeodato Sim?:
> * s. keeling [Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:52:30 -0700]:
> 
> > With help from one of the list recipients, this is now verified and
> > reproducible.  Something between me and those people whose keys are
> > determined by my copy of gpg to be "Bad signature", is mangling mail.
> > Specifically, that something is fixing line breaks:
> 
> > -> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the ow-ner.
> > +> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
> 
> More exactly, that something is removing "=\n" sequences from
> Quoted-Printable encoded mails, so the diff would read:

Doh!  It's probably procmail:

   :0 Bf
   * [^=]=$
   | perl -e 'foreach (<STDIN>) { s/=\r?\n//g; print; }'

That was intended to make up for line mangling that some mailers do
that would interfere with procmail spamtrap recipe matching.

Thanks Adeodato.  That was educational.


-- 
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)               http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling 
- -

Attachment: pgpCUZkeyPxcP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: