[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why not use /bin/noshell?



Tried the Titan noshell and it works as expected.
However, Tiger complains about it if you follow the CERT installation
procedure and "Register the noshell program as the valid login shell."
There's no need to do this, as noshell really doesn't care and still
works a non-valid shell.

[...]
NEW: --WARN-- [acc001w] Login ID games is disabled, but still has a
valid shell.
NEW: --WARN-- [acc001w] Login ID list is disabled, but still has a valid
shell.
NEW: --WARN-- [acc001w] Login ID lp is disabled, but still has a valid
shell.
NEW: --WARN-- [acc001w] Login ID mail is disabled, but still has a valid
shell.
NEW: --WARN-- [acc001w] Login ID man is disabled, but still has a valid
shell
[...]

About the license, it's available at http://www.fish.com/titan/
"4) You may distribute the programs of this Package in object code or
executable form, provided that you do at least ONE of the following:

a) distribute a Standard Version of the executables and library
files, together with instructions (in the manual page or equivalent)
on where to get the Standard Version.

b) accompany the distribution with the machine-readable source
of the Package with your modifications.

c) accompany any non-standard executables with their
corresponding Standard Version executables, giving the
non-standard executables non-standard names, and clearly
documenting the differences in manual pages (or equivalent),
together with instructions on where to get the Standard
Version.

d) make other distribution arrangements with the
Copyright Holder."

/Thomas
-- 
== thomas@northernsecurity.net | thomas@se.linux.org
== Encrypted e-mails preferred | GPG KeyID: 114AA85C
--

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: