Re: Why not use /bin/noshell? (was Re: Why do system users have valid shells)

To: Micah Anderson <micah@riseup.net>
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why not use /bin/noshell? (was Re: Why do system users have valid shells)
From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 19:33:23 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20031023173323.GA30291@dat.etsit.upm.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20031023153526.GE4387@riseup.net>
References: <[🔎] 3F963594.9030905@gmx.net> <[🔎] 20031023105219.GA8223@dat.etsit.upm.es> <[🔎] 20031023153526.GE4387@riseup.net>

On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Try the package "falselogin"
> 

That's not what I was looking for. I was looking for something that logged 
connection attempts, which falselogin does not.

Regards

Javi

Attachment: pgpTKhnzGzTT1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why not use /bin/noshell? (was Re: Why do system users have valid shells)
  - From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>

References:
- Why do system users have valid shells
  - From: Tobias Reckhard <jester71@gmx.net>
- Why not use /bin/noshell? (was Re: Why do system users have valid shells)
  - From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Re: Why not use /bin/noshell? (was Re: Why do system users have valid shells)
  - From: Micah Anderson <micah@riseup.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Why not use /bin/noshell? (was Re: Why do system users have valid shells)
Next by Date: Re: Why not use /bin/noshell? (was Re: Why do system users have valid shells)
Previous by thread: Re: Why not use /bin/noshell? (was Re: Why do system users have valid shells)
Next by thread: Re: Why not use /bin/noshell? (was Re: Why do system users have valid shells)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread