Re: [security-unixtech] Re: question about SSH / IPTABLES

To: Mike Dresser <mdresser_l@windsormachine.com>
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org, debian@euskal-linux.org
Subject: Re: [security-unixtech] Re: question about SSH / IPTABLES
From: Stanislas Rusinsky <rusinskystanislas@yahoo.fr>
Date: 23 Jan 2003 14:59:53 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1043330395.1475.55.camel@linux>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0301230830330.13295-100000@router.windsormachine.com>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0301230830330.13295-100000@router.windsormachine.com>

> 
> what if you have the no-port-forwarding in authorized_keys?
> 
> Mike

I'm not not totally sure but I think it is only for forbidding changing the port where to connect w/ ssh.

This option is sometimes used for tunneling others applications over SSH
or for passing trough NATs and FW.... afaik

Stan.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [security-unixtech] Re: question about SSH / IPTABLES
  - From: Mike Dresser <mdresser_l@windsormachine.com>

Prev by Date: Re: question about SSH / IPTABLES
Next by Date: RE: question about SSH / IPTABLES
Previous by thread: Re: [security-unixtech] Re: question about SSH / IPTABLES
Next by thread: Re: question about SSH / IPTABLES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread