RE: Updating Snort Signatures In Stable ? -- SNORT 1.9.0 for woody
I saw a lot of discution about snort 1.9 on woody.
I just whant to tell that we do need the 1.9 !
why don't we use an another directory (like contrib) where we can put
unstable softwares built for the stable distribution ?
For those who are interested in snort 1.9 without using unstable and without
last glibc and uploaded it to a website : http://acdessec.chez.tiscali.fr/
Please email me if you find bugs in these packages.
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Gustavo Franco [mailto:email@example.com]
> Envoyé : mercredi 11 décembre 2002 12:57
> À : firstname.lastname@example.org
> Objet : Re: Updating Snort Signatures In Stable ?
> On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > > No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
> > Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only
> possible, but easy.
> Nick Boyce!
> > apt-get build-dep snort && apt-get source -b snort
> > > And the snort updates?
> > Yes, they are built from the same source package.
> Will Nick do it daily,weekly or monthly? See below.
> > > The best alternative for you is apt-pinning feature, you can read more
> > > about it at apt-howto.
> > Nope. I know how to use apt, thank you very much. And I prefer not to
> > install unstable glibc on my stable systems.
> It isn't for you!
> Unstable glibc is a bad idea, i known.But and about unstable snort? One
> more time, and the snort updates?
> Gustavo Franco -- <email@example.com>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact