WebMaster wrote: > > > (pureftpd is more secure than proftpd) > > it s because we can read on pureftpd.org: > > "the number of root exploits found since the very first released > version is zero" > > we can t read things like that on postfix.org and proftpd.org You definitly need to check out vsftpd then. It's got "very secure" it it's _name_, so it must be secure! -- see shy jo, who finds it a find and well-designed ftp server nontheless
Attachment:
pgpufVatFCRt4.pgp
Description: PGP signature