This one time, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
> diagnoseproblems themselves? If they can't they should be running stable
> or at least testing?
I think there's nothing wrong with helping someone out, no matter
which group they're running. Why should it matter? Isn't this mailing
list called debian-security? Not debian-security-stable.
> Unstable is not just a name...
Neither is testing nor stable :)
-Anne
--
.-"".__."``". Anne Carasik, System Administrator
.-.--. _...' (/) (/) ``' gator at cacr dot caltech dot edu
(O/ O) \-' ` -="""=. ', Center for Advanced Computing Research
~`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Attachment:
pgpRCMaDL3rTr.pgp
Description: PGP signature