[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: icmp: type-#69 (catched that bastard)



Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com> writes:

> On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Tim Haynes wrote:
>
>> Could you include a complete `tcpdump -X' on one or two of the packets,
>> maybe make a series of them available for download in libpcap form so I
>> can oogle them in ethereal?
>
> Catched and oogled in ethereal:
>
[snip]
> |     Flags: 0x00
> |         .0.. = Don't fragment: Not set
> |         ..0. = More fragments: Not set
> |     Fragment offset: 0
> |     Time to live: 111
> |     Protocol: ICMP (0x01)
> |     Header checksum: 0x6ffb (correct)
> |     Source: 62.211.198.163 (62.211.198.163)

How many hops away is the supposed source if you traceroute to it and how
does that compare to the 17 the above would imply?

~Tim
-- 
<http://spodzone.org.uk/>



Reply to: