Re: Secure/hardened/minimal Debian (or "Why is the base system the way it is?")

To: Nicole Zimmerman <colby@wsu.edu>
Cc: Andrew Pollock <andrew@andrew.net.au>, <debian-security@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Secure/hardened/minimal Debian (or "Why is the base system the way it is?")
From: Rishi L Khan <rishi@UDel.Edu>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 23:01:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.SOL.4.44.0205192300270.10599-100000@copland.udel.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.OSF.4.10.10205191923240.5048-100000@unicorn.it.wsu.edu>

> (we are also not releasing *too* many of these yet, when we do the Ghost
> licensing fees might be higher than is justified).

when Ghost is prohibitive, consider using "dd", the standard unix disk
dump tool.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Secure/hardened/minimal Debian (or "Why is the base system the way it is?")
  - From: Nicole Zimmerman <colby@wsu.edu>

References:
- Re: Secure/hardened/minimal Debian (or "Why is the base system the way it is?")
  - From: Nicole Zimmerman <colby@wsu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Secure/hardened/minimal Debian (or "Why is the base system the way it is?")
Next by Date: Re: Secure/hardened/minimal Debian (or "Why is the base system the way it is?")
Previous by thread: Re: Secure/hardened/minimal Debian (or "Why is the base system the way it is?")
Next by thread: Re: Secure/hardened/minimal Debian (or "Why is the base system the way it is?")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread