Re: on potato's proftpd
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 05:53:35PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> why should we discuss this before pushing the temporary fix into the
> security archives???
Maybe because, as you say, the fix (read: workaround) is only temporary? :)
Including a new rule in the conffile won't automatically fix everything,
people who changed their copies of those conffiles will have to inspect
their stuff and merge in the fix. A solution coded into the program would
be much better...
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: