RE: [d-security] RE: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages
ahhh ok, I should have read that. I missed it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Hammers [mailto:ch@westend.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:50 AM
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [d-security] RE: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp
messages
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:44:49AM -0500, Gary MacDougall wrote:
> Right, and I think its strange that the parent process felt the need
> to kill the child process. It might be justified if the child seg'd
> or died, but i thought xinetd handled this with more grace than say
> inetd... just curious, thats all.
No, no, xinetd didn't killed the proftpd process. It just started it, then
realized that it's child just died, and then saved the pid number and
duration time for debugging reasons in the syslog as it couldn't do more.
.... ProFTPD terminating (signal 11)
xinetd[17612]: EXIT: ftp status=1 pid=3425 duration=8(sec)
-christian-
--
Christian Hammers WESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren Tel 0241/701333-0
ch@westend.com Internet & Security for Professionals Fax 0241/911879
WESTEND ist CISCO Systems Partner - Premium Certified
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.310 / Virus Database: 171 - Release Date: 12/19/2001
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.310 / Virus Database: 171 - Release Date: 12/19/2001
Reply to: