Re: Apt-get is insecure

To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Apt-get is insecure
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 12:42:46 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011215114246.GI5233@wiggy.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-security@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011215013152.GA7217@taj.san.rr.com>
References: <[🔎] 20011213172418.A25716@karjala.org> <[🔎] 20011213152447.GV14968@wiggy.net> <[🔎] E16EYS9-0002IA-00@mkiglo6> <[🔎] 20011213162014.GA14968@wiggy.net> <[🔎] 20011215013152.GA7217@taj.san.rr.com>

Previously Torrin wrote:
> Well, if it's not used (skipped) should we even bother installing
> debsig-verify and debsigs?

Right now it's only useful if you want to play with the technology.

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

References:
- Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Alexander Karelas <karjala_lists@yahoo.co.uk>
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Emiel Metselaar <e.d.metselaar@phys.rug.nl>
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Torrin <jonestor1976@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Next by Date: Re: Exim mail
Previous by thread: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Next by thread: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread