Re: Vulnerable SSH versions
On 2001-11-12 16:54 Ethan Benson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:10:10AM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
CH> Which makes me wonder, why ship Woody with 2.2.20 at all? Oh well, not
CH> my decision.
EB> because 2.4 is not stable yet.
*applause* I was hoping for that. Great decision. In fact the only
acceptable thing to do when we think of the current 2.4.x mess.
Regards,
Øyvind
+================== http://www.sunbase.org/sunny ===================+
| OpenPGP: 0xAD19826C 2000-01-24 Øyvind A. Holm <sunny@sunbase.org> |
| Fingerprint: EAE5 DCA0 0626 5DAA 72F8 0435 2E2B E476 AD19 826C |
+=========== 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2. ============+
Reply to: